
My final full day at TIFF extended into the next one with my first ever Midnight Madness screening which ended up my second favorite title of the festival.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, BRIAN MULRONEY
Winnipeg native Matthew Rankin’s second feature Universal Language was my favorite film of 2025. Imagining a Canada colonized by Iran, it was inventive, absurd, sidesplitting and in the end, oddly affecting. One could apply those descriptors in varying degrees to this follow up, but it does not do either film justice to compare them to each other. One depicts a topsy-turvy parallel universe with human nature still propelling it forward; the other posits that a former prime minister’s pickled brain is being kept alive in a glass jar, grandly exhibited as if it was The Wizard of Oz.
Where to begin with Ladies And Gentlemen, Brian Mulroney? A kaleidoscopic collage film feverishly packed with found footage and matching re-creations, it tracks the rise of our Quebec-born titular star from him first running for office and placing second on the ballot of the 1976 Progressive Conservative Convention leadership election to becoming Canada’s 18th Prime Minister in 1984. A congenial if unremarkable populist who today scans as sort of a right-wing Bill Clinton, Mulroney’s persona is perfect clay for Rankin to shape him into an unlikely rock star. What unspools often feels as if Ken Russell circa Tommy made a documentary about Gerald Ford.
The delirious use of period-inspired graphics and era-specific television tropes (the structure resembles a multi-episode, for-broadcast docu-series with cheeky nods to pop culture recognizable to anyone alive at that time) are so much fun to watch but they’re also a trojan horse, easing the viewer into the esoteric inner workings of Canadian politics. Footage of dowdy former PM John Diefenbacker is gleefully manipulated for him to appear as more of an evil foil to our hero than even the omniscient floating head of opposition party deity Pierre Trudeau. Rankin isn’t praising Mulroney, exactly, just demonstrating how the cult of personality towards national leaders was alive and kicking long before it all but defined some contemporary culprits.
His first feature Twentieth Century did similar service to Canadian PM William Lyon King roughly 70-80 years before. If that film often felt a little too heavily indebted to fellow Winnipeg auteur Guy Maddin’s silent-cinema shtick, this one revels in an entirely different aesthetic that, especially after the leftfield Universal Language, further establishes Rankin as no mere Maddin imitator but his rightful successor.
BITTER CHRISTMAS
Not a stretch to claim Almodovar’s long past his prime (Volver being his last great film for me) but his late-period work occasionally sparkles. Whether he’s essaying a wacky farce (I’m So Excited) or a tried-and-true melodrama (Parallel Mothers), no matter the quality, the result could not have come from anyone else. After a bumpy attempt at an English language picture (The Room Next Door), he returns to Spain with his most meta (and best) feature since Pain And Glory.
Revealed early on, there’s no great spoiler in disclosing that of the film’s two storylines, the earlier one is entirely the invention of the latter one’s central character. While Pain And Glory was his most blatantly autobiographical film with longtime collaborator Antonio Banderas as the director’s stand-in, Bitter Christmas has a sort of parallel figure in Raul (Leonardo Sbaraglia), who in the present-day narrative meticulously constructs a 2004-set screenplay involving Elsa (Barbara Lennie), herself a director of commercials. His focus on Raul, though, is less one of memoir than depicting an act of creation, exploring how real life can inspire fiction. As Raul’s screenplay develops and evolves, so does his approach to the point where he realizes what, and more importantly who the story’s about.
Although the constant shifts between narratives require an active viewing, the film’s tone is what may prove challenging for some audiences. Unsentimental, cynical and at times, a little pricky, it’s definitely not one the director’s more lighthearted romps, with the exception of Elsa’s nearly too-good-to-be-true boyfriend Bonifacio (Patrick Criado), a firefighter who moonlights as a male exotic dancer (his epic striptease scene is Almodovar at his campiest, sexiest best.) And yet, there’s a lucid energy that’s been missing from the director’s work for a little while. The furious cuts between storylines helps but there’s also the act of getting caught up in the creative process so thoroughly that when it all ends on an epiphany, it’s deeply gratifying.
LOW LIES THE LAND
This documentary follows three vineyard-owning families in the Piemonte region of Northern Italy. It is an idyllic setting to participate in such a time-honored trade as these subjects have done for generations. However, it only looks perfect on the surface. Global warming and all of its aftereffects (most notably droughts), along with other economic factors increasingly challenge the solvency of running such a business—enter an unnamed foreign investor only known as “The Broker” who is looking to buy up vineyard properties in this region, pushing each family to ponder whether it’s worth carrying on this tradition or time to pack it up.
Beautifully shot and somnambulantly paced, director Emanuele Gerosa’s film excels when he focuses on a real character such as an elderly matron who painstakingly moves herself around the kitchen in her chair to complete her domestic and professional tasks (someone really needs to buy her one with wheels.) While obviously an enticing place to visit, the film mostly lacks the spark and especially the quirk that materializes in similar portraits like The Truffle Hunters or Gates Of Heaven. Turns out winemaking is somewhat monotonous, boring work and via this depiction of it, lacking enough juice to sustain a feature.























